The documents presented below were submitted as a SSRHC Insight Grant on October 15th, 2013. Although, we were unsuccessful with the application (see here), the documents below provide a good sense of what the project is about.

Currently, funding via the Michael Smith Laboratories is making it possible to do some exploratory work on this project. (~$11,000) – blog post on start up costs for this can be found here.

December 2014 – June 2015:
– Hiring of six graduate student team for instructional purposes, and final fieldtrip template development (details, including fieldtrip lesson plans, found here).

– Hiring of part-time contract research work from three Faculty of Ed graduate students – blog post reflecting on this here (Tathali, Janice, and Latika).

– Ethics approval, and version 1 of survey questions developed. See here for more details (including docs outlining exact survey questions).

– Pre and post survey work from 15 fieldtrips (that’s close to 700 surveys!) Note that surveys were modified twice during the term (once for clarity, and once where a version that focused more on illustrating concepts was provided for younger classes, or classes with higher ESL ratios).

July 2015 to present:
– Some initial work on finding themes in survey responses.

– Some preliminary discussions on conference proceeding proposals.

– – –

no1 The summary. One page of meaty but concise goodness. (SubmitSummarySSRHCv2)

no2 The Details. As a dense primer on the topics at hand (a review of the current research and literature). Also, the nitty gritty of our planned methodology, and notes about the Science Creative Literacy Symposia program (the fieldtrip that the research largely revolves around). (SubmitDetailedDescriptionSSRHCv2). Note that there’s also a 2 page reference pdf. (SubmitReferencesSSRHCv2)

no3 The Budget Justification. Or how much we’ve asked for. Note the in kind funds involved (which are substantial and therefore, hopefully, makes the grant all the more attractive). (SubmitBudgetJustificationSSRHCv2)

no4  The Team. A little bit about Marie-Claire, David Ng, and Samson Nashon, plus some context about why our varied background is pretty much perfect for this kind of research.(SubmitResearchTeamSSRHCv2). Note that there are elements of our backgrounds also presented in our submitted CVs. These can be seen here and here

no5 The Knowledge Mobilization Plan. Or, in other words, how do we plan on sharing the research to the wider public. Specifically written to discuss ways to create communities where science, creativity and writing discourses can intersect. This section also summarizes intended efforts to popularize and/or speak academically about the work. (KnowledgeMobilizationSSRHCv2)



  1. In which the grant proposal is done, submitted, and shared. – Adventures in the Science and Creativity Venn

  2. A Brief History of Time(ly SSHRC feedback). – Adventures in the Science and Creativity Venn

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s